When it comes to pay per click advertising, getting people to click on your PPC ad is only half the battle. Once visitors land on your PPC landing page, the real work begins. From there, you also need them to click on the call to action (CTA) on your landing page.
That’s the only way to actually convert leads. So if your landing pages are struggling to convert visitors, maybe it’s your CTA.
If your landing page is weak, cluttered, or disconnected from the ad copy, your paid traffic will leave quickly. That means wasted ad spend, poor conversion rate, and underperforming PPC campaigns.
A good PPC landing page solves this. A dedicated PPC landing page focuses on one goal, supports the desired action, and aligns perfectly with the ad's message. This improves message match, strengthens ad relevance, and contributes to better quality score and ad rank in google ads.
Fortunately, there are many ways to get more users to click on your CTAs in your PPC landing page. You just need to learn the tricks of the trade.
In this article, we’ll go over what those landing page CTA best practices are to improve conversion rate optimization and overall campaign performance, but first, let’s define what a CTA is in the first place.
A call to action (CTA) is the most important part of a PPC landing page. It’s what converts visitors into leads and drives your conversion goals.
Basically, a CTA is a prompt that invites users to take a specific action.
Most CTAs offer something valuable (like a free ebook download or newsletter signup) in exchange for the user’s contact information (like their name and email address).
The point of the CTA is to lead potential customers into your sales funnel. From there, you can nurture them with more valuable content until they eventually make a purchase.
So how do you make the CTAs on your landing pages as effective as possible? Here are ten tips:
The call to action button is just what it sounds like. It’s a virtual button on your landing page that contains the CTA text. For example, the call to action button might be a green rectangle that includes the words “Download Your Free Ebook.”
Whatever your call to action button is, you want it to stand out from the rest of the page. Your CTA button is one of the most important key elements on any PPC landing page. A strong CTA helps guide PPC traffic toward the desired action without hesitation. To do this, you can use a different text font (e.g., bolded or italic) and contrasting colors.
Humans are visual creatures, which means (among other things) that we are naturally attracted to sharp variations in colors. You can use this to your advantage by playing off different color contrasts. For example, if your landing page background is blue, you might make your call to action button orange so it really stands out.
You can also try using a free online color scheme generator to come up with ideas. A good CTA example would be one that blends seamlessly with the rest of the page elements while still grabbing users’ attention.
Source: https://www.shutterstock.com/blog/color-scheme-definitions-types-examples
Another way to make your call to action button stand out on the landing page is to play with its size and page layouts. Make it big enough to call attention but not so big that it becomes too distracting from reading the rest of the page. On a cluttered page, your CTA gets lost. On a focused standalone web page, it becomes the natural next step.
By focusing on the visual design of your call to action button, you can encourage users to click on it and improve the overall conversion rate of your marketing campaigns. A well-designed CTA improves conversion rate and reduces drop off points, especially for cold traffic coming from a search ad.
When writing a call to action, it’s easy to resort to phrases like “contact us” or “learn more.” But such calls to action are so overused that many people gloss over them.
Instead, try to put yourself in your target customers' shoes. What are their pain points? Then craft your CTA according to that. Your CTA copy should match user intent and clearly reflect what the PPC ad promised.
For example, if your target customers have a hard time remembering birthdays, lure them in with a CTA that says “Install this scheduling tool to never forget another birthday.” It’s much more specific and tailored to the value proposition your service provides. This improves ad relevance and helps your PPC campaigns perform better across search engines.
That said, you also need to make sure you keep your CTA clear and to the point. Most people skim the internet, whether they’re reading a blog post or browsing an online store. So if your CTA copy is too long or clever, people will probably move on. And if you can’t convince them to click on your call to action button the first time, they probably never will.
So make your CTA crystal clear. Say exactly what you want the web visitor to do and exactly what they’ll get by clicking. Use action words to evoke a quick reaction. Your CTA should reinforce the ad's message and support strong message match.
By writing clearly and directly, your CTA will be much more persuasive.
A PPC landing page should never hide its CTA. The last thing you want is for visitors to be looking for a call to action button on your landing page and not find it.
To ensure people always have the opportunity to click the call to action button, place it somewhere it can always be seen. For example, you could include it in a floating header or footer that moves along the landing page as the user scrolls up or down.
The point is you want the CTA placement to be visible, no matter where the web visitors land on the page. If you only place it at the end of the page, visitors may never get to it or see it.
Strong PPC landing page examples often use sticky elements or repeated CTAs to reduce drop off points and guide paid traffic efficiently.
The call to action button should be easy to locate. So, place it where it makes the most sense, whether on desktops or mobile devices.
That said, you don’t want to include so many calls to action that you come across as too pushy or spammy. This will only turn people off.
But you also don’t want web visitors to leave your page without clicking on the call to action button. Otherwise, what’s the point?
So, find the right CTA frequency balance.
Too few CTAs and users leave without converting. Too many and you confuse users.
A good PPC landing page maintains a clean structure while reinforcing the same desired action throughout the landing page. This keeps your PPC landing experience focused and effective.
Each PPC landing page should focus on one goal. Even if you place multiple CTAs across your landing page, you want to stick to just one kind. Here’s what I mean:
If the landing page’s main purpose is to get visitors to sign up for your email marketing list, don’t also include CTAs to order a product off your website.
You can have multiple CTAs, but they shouldn’t call on visitors to perform more than one action.
Why? Asking target customers to do more than one thing can be confusing. In fact, this may overwhelm them so that they don’t click on any call to action button at all, weakening the conversion rate.
If you have multiple marketing campaigns running, create separate landing pages for each of them. That way, each blog post or landing page is focused on one specific value proposition and action.
A dedicated landing pages approach works best, where each ad group leads to a specific PPC landing page.
This improves message match, strengthens ad relevance, and supports better quality score in Google Ads.
Having an attractive CTA is not enough. You also need to direct visitors’ attention to it with visual cues.
You can do this in two ways: subtle or not-so-subtle cues.
A subtle visual cue could be images or converging lines whose linear pathways indirectly point toward the CTA—like a photo of someone whose eyes are looking at the CTA. Users will then subconsciously want to look there, too. A clean standalone web experience helps keep attention on the desired action.
Source: https://instapage.com/blog/what-are-visual-cues
A conspicuous visual cue could be bright red arrows that point toward the CTA. This can also be effective, but you must be careful not to make it appear too distracting or promotional.
Whatever you do, you want your landing page to have a clean visual flow that ultimately directs users to the CTA button. Strong PPC landing page design ensures users naturally move toward the CTA without friction.
Another way to make your CTA stand out is to put white space around it.
White space (aka negative space) refers to the areas of your PPC landing page that don’t have any text or images—nothing.
While you might think white space is a waste of precious real estate, it’s not. It actually helps provide some balance to your landing page and, if used artfully, can actually make your CTA stand out.
For one, if you leave a lot of white space around the CTA, it won’t look cluttered—like it’s drowning in text and graphics. Instead of a cluttered page, it will stand out because it’s set off by itself. It improves readability and keeps your landing page easy to scan for PPC traffic. This is especially important for paid search visitors who want quick clarity.
Play with the white space around your CTA to call more attention to it.
Source: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/the-power-of-white-space
To stand out, your CTA also has to offer something unique. What are the benefits of clicking on it? How will it improve your visitors’ lives? What’s in it for them? If your CTA doesn’t answer these questions, you may want to rethink it.
A good PPC landing page explains what users gain by taking action. Whether it is saving time, making money, or solving a problem, your message should align with the target audience.
Consider your typical visitor’s pain points. Then show how your offer is a solution to their problems. Including social proof can further strengthen trust and improve conversion rate.
For example, if your CTA is to sign up for a weekly newsletter that offers actionable tips on how to double your productivity, point that out. In this case, your CTA might read “Sign Up for My Weekly Newsletter to 2X Your Productivity.”
At the end of the day, concrete and relevant benefits help sell visitors on your CTA.
People are heavily influenced by their emotions. Though the rational brain plays a role in the decision-making process, emotions play an arguably bigger one.
That’s why it’s important for your CTA to appeal to people’s emotions. If you tap into people’s emotions, visitors are more likely to pay attention and click. This strengthens message match with your search ad and encourages faster decisions from cold traffic.
For example, you might create a sense of urgency by promoting a limited-time offer. This may activate their fear of missing out (FOMO). Or you might appeal to their sense of danger with a CTA that says “Sign the Petition to Keep Your Neighborhood Safe.”
Don’t forget to also surround the CTA with relevant images (where appropriate). Combining emotional appeal with ad relevance improves engagement across your PPC campaigns.
So if, for example, the CTA calls on the reader to improve their life by getting a copy of your new self-help book, include a photo of someone reading the book with a smile on their face next to the CTA.
This will draw a more immediate emotional response from the user than words alone ever could. After all, a picture is worth a thousand words.
Last but not least, subject your landing page CTAs to A/B tests.
Testing different variations helps improve conversion rate optimization. You can test CTA wording, button placement, or page layouts to see what works best.
An A/B test (aka split test) refers to developing two slightly different versions of something (in this case a CTA) and then running a test to see which performs better according to common marketing metrics like click-through rate (CTR) and conversion rate.
You could test a CTA’s button size, copy, color, font, placement, page frequency, and more. Just make sure to test only one variable at a time so you can narrow down what exactly is contributing to a CTAs performance.
By constantly conducting A/B tests, you can gradually fine-tune your landing page CTA until it becomes a reliable conversion machine. Over time, this improves your landing page experience, strengthens ad campaigns, and increases efficiency across your pay per click efforts.
Now that you know the best practices for crafting effective PPC landing page CTAs, you’re ready to take your marketing to the next level.
Don’t have the time or manpower to handle your ad campaigns? That’s okay. We’re here to help.
Partner with PPC.co to take advantage of our managed PPC services. We can help you run ads across Google, Bing, Facebook, LinkedIn, and more. Whatever your advertising needs, we have you covered.
We’ll also help you optimize your landing page CTAs so that they bring you more business. To get started, contact us for a free proposal. We look forward to chatting!
%201.svg){kind=logo}
The SaaS marketing landscape has shifted from aggressive acquisition to disciplined, efficiency-driven growth. Over the past 12–24 months, rising acquisition costs, tighter budgets, and longer sales cycles have pushed companies to rethink how they attract and retain customers. Growth is still there, but it’s no longer coming from “spend more, scale faster.” It’s coming from smarter targeting, stronger positioning, and better lifecycle marketing.
Customer acquisition strategies are moving away from broad, paid-heavy funnels toward more balanced systems. Product-led growth (PLG), organic search, community building, and partner ecosystems are taking on a larger role. Paid channels still matter, but they’re under pressure to prove ROI faster. Many teams are reallocating budget toward owned channels like email, SEO, and content, where compounding returns are easier to justify.
Performance benchmarks are tightening. CAC has increased across most SaaS categories, especially in B2B, while conversion rates have plateaued or declined slightly due to buyer fatigue and increased competition. At the same time, retention and expansion metrics are getting more attention than ever. Net revenue retention (NRR), product adoption, and onboarding efficiency are now just as important as top-of-funnel metrics.
There’s also a noticeable shift in buyer expectations. SaaS buyers want faster value, clearer messaging, and less friction. They expect personalized experiences but are more cautious about data privacy. Long demos and generic nurture sequences are losing effectiveness. In their place, we’re seeing shorter sales cycles driven by self-serve experiences, transparent pricing, and proof-based marketing like case studies and peer reviews.
SaaS is still growing, but it is no longer a “just show up and win” market. The sector has moved into a more disciplined phase where buyers expect faster time-to-value, vendors face heavier competition, and category leaders are separating themselves through distribution, retention, and ecosystem strength, not just product breadth. In practical terms, that means the market is big, still expanding, and much less forgiving. (Grand View Research, Gartner)
There is no single universally accepted SaaS TAM number, because firms define the category differently. A conservative benchmark from Grand View Research puts the global SaaS market at $399.1 billion in 2024, with a projection of $819.2 billion by 2030. A more aggressive view from Fortune Business Insights values the market at $315.7 billion in 2025 and forecasts it to reach $1.48 trillion by 2034. The gap matters less than the shared direction: every major forecast points to strong structural expansion, with cloud-delivered software still taking share from legacy deployment models. (Grand View Research, Fortune Business Insights)
For marketers, the important read is this: TAM is still expanding, but the easy whitespace is shrinking in mature categories like CRM, collaboration, and marketing automation. Growth is increasingly concentrated in AI-enabled workflows, vertical SaaS, security, data infrastructure, and tools that can prove hard-dollar ROI. That last point is partly an inference, but it is supported by IDC’s view that SaaS applications remain the largest slice of public cloud spend, while AI platforms are among the fastest-growing areas of cloud investment. (IDC, Techiexpert.com, Gartner)
Using the most defensible public estimates, the sector is growing at a healthy double-digit clip. Grand View Research projects a 12.0% CAGR from 2025 to 2030 for SaaS overall. IDC says SaaS applications are expected to grow at a 16.5% five-year CAGR through 2028 within the broader public cloud market. Gartner’s broader public cloud forecast also shows strong momentum, with total public cloud end-user spending rising from $561.0 billion in 2023 to $675.4 billion in 2024 and $723.4 billion in 2025. (Grand View Research, IDC, Gartner)
That growth, though, hides a more complicated operating reality. Revenue pools are expanding, but go-to-market efficiency has tightened. Marketing budgets are not rising at the same pace as the opportunity. Gartner’s 2025 CMO Spend Survey found budgets flat at 7.7% of company revenue, which tells you something important: SaaS marketing leaders are being asked to capture growth in a larger market without assuming bigger budget cushions. (Gartner, Gartner)
Digital adoption is no longer the story. Depth of adoption is. Gartner forecasts that 90% of organizations will adopt a hybrid cloud approach through 2027, which reinforces how mainstream cloud software has become in enterprise environments. IDC also expects SaaS applications to account for more than 40% of public cloud spending in 2024, underscoring how central subscription software has become to enterprise tech stacks. Okta’s 2025 Businesses at Work report adds another practical signal: security, compliance, identity, and passwordless tools are now deeply embedded in day-to-day business operations, not treated as edge investments. (Gartner, Techiexpert.com, Okta)
One useful nuance here: adoption is broad, but not endless. BetterCloud’s 2025 State of SaaS framing points to a decline in pure app proliferation, suggesting the market is shifting from “add more tools” to “rationalize the stack.” That is a meaningful change for marketers. Winning is less about entering a greenfield software environment and more about replacing incumbents, consolidating categories, or proving that a new AI layer deserves budget. (BetterCloud, a CoreStack Company, BetterCloud, a CoreStack Company)
The SaaS sector is not one thing. It is better described as unevenly mature.
So, if you need one clean label for the sector overall, it is this: maturing, with pockets of saturation and a few breakout frontiers. That matters because marketing strategy changes by maturity level. In saturated markets, brand, proof, and distribution efficiency do the heavy lifting. In earlier markets, education and category creation still matter. In maturing markets, both jobs happen at once, which is why SaaS marketing feels harder right now than it did a few years ago. (Gartner, McKinsey & Company, BetterCloud, a CoreStack Company)
SaaS buyer behavior has changed in a way that quietly rewrites marketing strategy. Buyers are not waiting for sellers to explain the category anymore. They are researching earlier, comparing more options in parallel, and forming preferences before they ever fill out a demo form. In 6sense’s 2024 B2B Buyer Experience Report, 81% of buyers said they had already picked a preferred vendor before first contact with sales. That is a huge signal for SaaS teams: brand visibility, category education, review presence, and proof assets now shape the deal long before pipeline appears in the CRM. (6sense, 6sense)
For most B2B SaaS companies, the real buying unit is not a single persona. It is a small committee with competing incentives. A typical SaaS buying group includes an economic buyer focused on budget and business impact, a functional lead focused on workflow fit, a technical evaluator focused on security and integrations, and one or more end users who care about ease of use and speed. McKinsey’s 2024 B2B Pulse research shows that buyers want a balanced mix of digital self-service, remote human interaction, and in-person engagement across the journey, which reinforces the idea that SaaS marketers are not building for one lead, but for multiple stakeholders moving through different information needs at the same time. (McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company)
In practical terms, the strongest SaaS ICPs now share five traits. They have a painful, measurable workflow problem. They can justify software spend against revenue, cost, risk, or productivity. They expect short time-to-value. They prefer to learn independently before talking to a rep. And they increasingly need internal consensus before purchase, especially when the product touches security, data, or company-wide processes. Gartner’s 2025 sales survey adds another layer: 61% of B2B buyers prefer a rep-free buying experience overall, which makes frictionless research and self-serve evaluation much more important than they used to be. (Gartner, Gartner)
The demographic shift is subtle but important. More purchase influence is moving toward millennial and Gen Z professionals, especially in mid-market and digital-native teams. Forrester predicts that more than half of large B2B transactions above $1 million will be processed through digital self-serve channels, reflecting a buyer base that is more comfortable with digital-first evaluation and less patient with slow, rep-controlled journeys. (Forrester)
Psychographically, the strongest pattern is skepticism. Buyers are still open to new tools, especially AI-enabled ones, but they are harder to impress. They want proof, not hype. Salesforce’s latest connected customer research found only 42% of customers trust businesses to use AI ethically, down from 58% in 2023. That trust gap matters a lot for SaaS marketers leaning on personalization, automation, or AI-heavy product messaging. It means the winning tone is confident and specific, not breathless. (Salesforce, Salesforce)
Another shift: convenience is no longer a nice extra. It is expected. McKinsey’s 2024 B2B Pulse shows buyers continue to prefer a mix of channels, split roughly in thirds across in-person, remote, and digital self-service interactions. That is a useful reminder that “digital-first” does not mean “digital-only.” Buyers want control when researching, but they still want expert access when risk or complexity rises. SaaS teams that force either extreme usually lose points. (McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company)
The SaaS buyer journey is now heavily front-loaded online. Discovery happens through search, peer recommendations, review platforms, communities, analyst content, podcasts, LinkedIn, and AI-assisted research. Shortlists often form before a rep is involved. That is why content built for “problem framing” and “vendor confidence” tends to outperform generic thought leadership. If buyers already arrive with a favorite, marketing’s job starts much earlier than traditional lead capture models assume. (6sense, 6sense)
Offline and human-assisted moments still matter, but usually later. They show up during technical validation, stakeholder alignment, pricing negotiation, or final risk reduction. Gartner’s guidance on hybrid buying and McKinsey’s rule-of-thirds research both point in the same direction: buyers want self-serve discovery, then selective human help where uncertainty is highest. That means SaaS marketing should treat the website, demo environment, onboarding preview, pricing page, and case study library as part of the sales team, not just support materials. (Gartner, McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company)
The expectation stack has gotten tougher.
First, privacy and trust. Buyers still want tailored experiences, but they are more cautious about how their data is used. Salesforce’s customer research makes that tension clear: people want relevance, but they are uneasy about opaque AI and data practices. For SaaS, that puts pressure on transparent consent, clear data handling language, and personalization that feels useful instead of creepy. (Salesforce, Salesforce)
Second, speed. Buyers expect fast answers, quick setup, and visible value early in the relationship. That is one reason product-led motions, free trials, interactive demos, and transparent pricing pages keep gaining ground. A slow handoff process now feels like a warning sign, not just a mild annoyance. Gartner’s finding that a majority of buyers prefer rep-free experiences only reinforces this. (Gartner, Gartner)
Third, personalization with substance. Buyers do not just want their first name in an email subject line. They want messaging that reflects their industry, use case, maturity, and likely objections. In a category as crowded as SaaS, relevance often beats volume. That is also why vertical landing pages, role-based nurture streams, and industry-specific case studies have become much more important than broad one-size-fits-all campaigns. This last point is an inference from the broader buying research, but it follows directly from the rise in independent research behavior and consensus buying. (6sense, McKinsey & Company)
If Section 3 was about how buyers behave, Section 4 is about where that behavior turns into measurable performance.
The short version is this: no single channel “wins” SaaS marketing anymore. Paid search still captures intent, SEO still compounds, email still punches above its weight for retention, and paid social still matters for demand creation and remarketing. But the gap between efficient and wasteful execution has widened. Costs are up in auction-based channels, buyers are less patient, and the channels that work best now tend to be the ones that match buyer intent instead of forcing it. (WordStream, HubSpot Blog, Content Marketing Institute)
Across marketing budgets overall, paid media remains the single largest resource area at 30.6% of spend in Gartner’s 2025 CMO Spend Survey. That matters because it confirms something many SaaS teams feel every quarter: performance marketing is still central, even while finance teams push harder on efficiency, attribution, and payback. In parallel, content and owned channels are holding their ground because they help reduce dependence on ever-more-expensive paid acquisition. (Gartner, Gartner)
These benchmarks are best read as directional ranges, not promises. They vary by SaaS segment, ACV, audience quality, funnel stage, offer strength, and landing-page quality. For example, enterprise cybersecurity SaaS and SMB productivity SaaS can live in very different worlds even on the same platform. Still, these are useful planning anchors.
If you zoom out, the SaaS martech stack is getting both bigger and more opinionated at the same time. Bigger because teams keep adding AI, analytics, and workflow tools. More opinionated because they are no longer buying software just to “have a stack.” They want a tighter operating system for revenue. MarTech’s 2025 State of Your Stack Survey found that 62.1% of respondents use more tools than they did two years ago, CRM is the most-used category at 86.4%, marketing automation is at 76.9%, analytics/BI is at 72.2%, and generative AI tools have already climbed to 68.6% of stacks. At the same time, 65.7% said data integration is one of their biggest stack-management challenges, which tells you exactly where the friction lives. (MarTech)
For SaaS marketers, the stack usually revolves around four layers: system of record, campaign orchestration, analytics, and activation. The system of record is still CRM. On that front, Salesforce remains the heavyweight. Salesforce says IDC ranked it the #1 CRM provider again, with 20.7% worldwide CRM share in 2024. A different methodology from Apps Run The World puts Salesforce at 26.1% share of the 2024 CRM applications market, with Adobe, HubSpot, Oracle, and SAP behind it. The exact percentage changes by dataset, but the directional truth is clear: Salesforce still owns the enterprise conversation, while HubSpot keeps gaining credibility as the all-in-one option for mid-market and growth-stage teams. (Salesforce, APPS RUN THE WORLD)
That split shows up in user sentiment too. Gartner Peer Insights compares HubSpot and Salesforce in the CRM Customer Engagement Center market and shows HubSpot at 4.6 stars versus Salesforce at 4.4, though Salesforce has far more review volume. Read that carefully: Salesforce still dominates by footprint and complexity tolerance, but HubSpot often wins on usability and speed to value. In SaaS, that usually maps to company stage. Enterprise teams still lean Salesforce. Mid-market SaaS teams often lean HubSpot when they want tighter sales-marketing-service alignment without a six-month implementation story attached to it. (Gartner)
On the marketing automation side, HubSpot Marketing Hub and Adobe Marketo Engage remain two of the clearest reference points. Gartner Peer Insights lists HubSpot Marketing Hub at 4.4 stars across 2,605 ratings and Adobe Marketo Engage at 4.3 across 1,055 ratings. HubSpot’s review language leans toward “unified,” “user-friendly,” and “strong CRM integration,” while Marketo’s positioning still centers on customization, orchestration, and depth. That is the classic tradeoff: HubSpot tends to win where speed, simplicity, and integrated reporting matter most; Marketo tends to win where workflow complexity and enterprise-grade control matter more than ease. (Gartner, Gartner)
For product and growth analytics, the market is still anchored by Amplitude and Mixpanel. Gartner Peer Insights shows Amplitude at 4.4 stars with 337 reviews and Mixpanel at 4.5 with 115 reviews in web, product, and digital experience analytics. In practical SaaS terms, both sit in the “high-adoption, high-satisfaction” tier for product-led growth teams. Amplitude tends to be favored in larger, more mature experimentation environments, while Mixpanel remains strong with teams that want speed and sharp event-based analysis without excess ceremony. (Gartner)
For customer data and activation, the market is getting more interesting. Twilio Segment still has strong satisfaction signals in Gartner’s CDP category, where Gartner lists Segment at 4.5 stars with 95 ratings. Hightouch, meanwhile, is a good read on where the stack is going, not just where it has been. G2 shows Hightouch with 4.6 out of 5 across 386 reviews, and MarTech’s 2025 research plus Chiefmartec’s 2025 landscape work both point in the same direction: warehouse-first architectures, composable activation, and homegrown extensions are becoming much more normal. In plain English, more SaaS teams want their data warehouse to act like the truth layer, then push clean data into downstream tools instead of trapping identity and audience logic inside one monolithic suite. (Gartner, G2, Chief MarTec, MarTech)
The most important shift is not that one giant vendor suddenly disappeared. It is that the center of gravity is moving. MarTech’s 2025 State of Your Stack Survey shows nearly a quarter of respondents expect new tools and capabilities to come from homegrown solutions in the next 12 to 24 months, and Chiefmartec reports that custom-built platforms in B2B jumped from 2% to 10% as the identified center of the stack. That is not a mass exodus from commercial software. It is a sign that AI, APIs, and low-code tooling are making “buy plus build” a lot more realistic. (Chief MarTec, MarTech)
The replacement data is even more revealing. In MarTech’s 2025 Replacement Survey, marketing automation replacements fell from 31.1% in 2024 to 19.4% in 2025, CRM replacements dropped from 22.1% to 9.7%, and email distribution replacements fell from 24.3% to 13.7%. Analytics/BI was the only category that grew year over year, inching from 19.6% to 20.2%, while CDP replacements also nudged up from 11.9% to 12.9%. That does not mean automation or CRM are dead. Quite the opposite. It suggests those categories are maturing, harder to rip out, and increasingly being extended instead of replaced, while analytics and data tooling keep evolving because teams are still chasing a cleaner view of performance and customer behavior. (MarTech)
There is also a meaningful shift in data architecture. Chiefmartec’s 2025 landscape notes that in B2B companies, CRM or marketing automation still tends to sit at the center of the stack, but in B2C and hybrid models, cloud data warehouses rose while CDPs lost share as the center platform. MarTech’s stack survey reinforces the same pressure from a different angle: data silos were the top concern about the future of the martech stack, and integration was one of the biggest current management challenges. That is why warehouse-native and reverse-ETL tools are getting so much attention. The pain is less “we lack tools” and more “our tools do not share context fast enough.” (Chief MarTec, MarTech, Hightouch)
The safest way to think about modern SaaS integrations is as a chain, not a menu.
First comes CRM plus marketing automation. That remains the core handoff between demand generation, lifecycle, and sales. G2’s own category guidance for marketing automation explicitly emphasizes CRM integration because that is what lets teams connect lead scoring, nurturing, attribution, and closed-won revenue. This is still the non-negotiable integration in B2B SaaS. (G2)
Next comes the data layer. More teams are wiring CRM, product analytics, support data, billing, and usage signals into a warehouse or lakehouse, then activating that data back into ad platforms, email tools, and sales systems. Chiefmartec has been blunt about this trend, describing the universal data layer as a major martech direction, while Hightouch’s 2025 data report argues that the real problem is usually not tool count but data accessibility. In other words, the winning integration pattern is less about stitching apps together one by one and more about making customer data portable across the stack. (Chief MarTec, Hightouch)
Then comes product-plus-marketing integration. This is where SaaS is a little different from many other sectors. Product analytics tools like Amplitude and Mixpanel are no longer just for product managers. They are increasingly tied into lifecycle messaging, expansion campaigns, onboarding triggers, and account scoring. That shift matters because SaaS growth now depends more on activation and retention than on raw lead volume alone. The tools that can connect product behavior to marketing orchestration are gaining strategic weight for exactly that reason. (Gartner, MarTech)
Creative is doing more of the selling now.
That sounds obvious, but it has real consequences for SaaS marketers. Buyers are seeing more ads, more AI-written content, more product noise, and more lookalike claims than they were even a year ago. So the creative that breaks through is not the prettiest or the loudest. It is the clearest, the most believable, and the fastest to connect a pain point to an outcome. LinkedIn’s Creative Labs research, based on more than 13,000 B2B video ads, found that some video styles materially outperformed others on engagement and dwell time, which is a strong reminder that format and storytelling choices now shape results far more than surface polish alone. (Search Engine Land, PPC Land)
The broad trend is a shift away from polished, corporate-sounding creative and toward formats that feel direct, useful, and human. Content Marketing Institute’s 2025 B2B benchmarks show that short articles/posts, videos, and case studies are among the most-used content formats, while top-performing teams are also using AI heavily without letting it flatten their point of view. (Content Marketing Institute)
In practice, five creative patterns are showing up again and again in strong SaaS campaigns:
The best CTAs in SaaS are getting more concrete, less needy, and more tied to buyer intent.
The old blunt calls like “Contact Us” or “Learn More” still exist, but they are usually weak unless the buyer already knows exactly what they want. High-performing SaaS CTAs now tend to fall into three buckets:
That pattern lines up with what practitioners keep seeing on SaaS landing pages: lower-friction CTAs work better earlier in the journey, while high-intent CTAs perform when the page already carries proof, clarity, and urgency. HubSpot’s own CTA reporting framework centers on click rate and downstream conversion analysis, which is a good reminder that CTA performance is not about button copy alone. It is about matching the ask to buyer readiness. (HubSpot Knowledge Base)
There is also a real shift in tone. The best CTAs sound helpful, not pushy. “See how it works” usually feels safer than “Request your consultation now.” In SaaS, that matters because many buyers are still self-educating and do not want to be forced into a sales process too early. Gartner’s recent finding that 61% of B2B buyers prefer a rep-free buying experience makes that tone shift even more important. (Forrester)
Short-form video is no longer optional filler. It has become one of the clearest creative growth areas in both B2C and B2B. On LinkedIn, video is shared far more than other formats, and LinkedIn Creative Labs found that different storytelling styles can produce major differences in engagement outcomes. Search Engine Land’s coverage of that study notes that cinematic brand films drove 129% engagement lift, while “real talk” video styles improved dwell time significantly. (Search Engine Land)
Carousels are also holding up well because they let SaaS brands teach, compare, and sequence information without demanding too much upfront attention. This is especially useful for product education, “before vs. after” stories, competitive alternatives, and myth-busting creative. Third-party LinkedIn benchmark roundups also continue to point to stronger engagement from richer visual formats such as carousel and video compared with basic static placements, though exact outcomes vary a lot by execution quality. (huble.com, Marketing LTB-)
Then there is the UGC effect. In B2B SaaS, true UGC is less common than in consumer categories, but the style has crossed over hard. Marketers are using customer clips, screen-recorded walkthroughs, rep or founder videos, day-in-the-life explainers, and lightly edited testimonial-style content because it feels more believable than polished brand ads. Even when the source is internal, the winning aesthetic is usually “credible person with something useful to say,” not “studio voice reading approved copy.” (Marketing LTB-, Oktopost)
SaaS messaging has become more outcome-led and less feature-led. That is the big story.
In security and IT SaaS, trust language still matters, but empty safety claims are not enough anymore. Buyers want specifics: compliance posture, deployment clarity, incident prevention, governance, and integration fit. In finance or RevOps SaaS, the winning angle is often time saved, visibility improved, revenue leakage prevented, or manual work removed. In HR or collaboration SaaS, the message tends to perform better when it is framed around speed, consistency, and team adoption rather than broad digital transformation talk.
AI messaging is where a lot of brands go sideways. Buyers are interested, but they are skeptical. Salesforce’s latest connected-customer research showed trust in ethical AI use remains limited, and Gartner reported that poor personalization can actually raise customer regret and lower future purchase intent. So “AI-powered” works best when it explains the job being done, not when it floats as a vague badge on top of weak positioning. (Qualtrics, Gartner)
That leads to one of the clearest messaging rules in SaaS right now: the more advanced the product sounds, the more concrete the copy needs to be.
The most useful SaaS campaigns from the last 12 months did not win because they were flashy. They won because they matched channel to buyer intent, tightened the handoff between content and conversion, and measured the part that actually matters: pipeline, lead quality, acquisition efficiency, or revenue impact.
That is the thread running through the three campaigns below. One used AI-assisted content and lifecycle orchestration to drive more leads and revenue. One turned affiliate infrastructure into a growth engine. One used an unexpected platform and a webinar-first motion to open a new market with lower acquisition costs. Different plays, same lesson: strong SaaS marketing now looks less like “more activity” and more like system design. (HubSpot, impact.com, Hashmeta)
HubSpot’s recent FBA case study is one of the cleaner examples of an efficiency-first SaaS-adjacent growth campaign. According to HubSpot, after adopting Breeze, FBA increased content production by 250%, improved lead generation by 216%, and saw a 63% revenue boost. The core move was not simply “use AI.” It was using AI to remove production bottlenecks, speed up useful content creation, and better connect marketing output with sales follow-through. (HubSpot)
What made it work was the sequence. First, FBA attacked internal friction. Then it turned that extra content velocity into more lead generation. Then it connected that volume to revenue instead of stopping at vanity metrics. That matters because a lot of SaaS teams are currently over-focusing on AI content throughput while under-focusing on whether the extra output actually improves funnel performance. FBA’s result is more convincing precisely because it ties content scale to lead and revenue movement. (HubSpot)
Channel mix: AI-assisted content creation, CRM-driven orchestration, sales-marketing alignment.
Goal: Increase lead generation efficiency and support revenue growth.
Reported result: +250% content production, +216% lead generation, +63% revenue. (HubSpot)
The strategic lesson here is simple. AI works best when it removes friction inside a working system. It does not rescue weak positioning. It accelerates a sound engine.
A more unusual but very relevant campaign came from Semrush’s affiliate program migration on impact.com. The published case study says Semrush achieved 400% growth in new affiliate partner sign-ups within six months of migration, while successfully migrating more than 1,000 partners and modernizing attribution from a 10-year cookie life to a 120-day window. (impact.com)
This is a strong campaign example because it is not just a tech migration story. It is really a partner-marketing and channel-operations story. Semrush treated affiliate growth as a structured acquisition channel, improved attribution logic, cleaned up the partner experience, and made the program easier to manage and scale. In a SaaS environment where paid media costs remain high, this kind of partner-led acquisition system can create a very attractive supplement to search and social. (impact.com, Global Performance Marketing Awards)
Channel mix: Affiliate/partner marketing, attribution redesign, platform migration, automated partner operations.
Goal: Scale partner acquisition without disrupting an existing ecosystem.
Reported result: +400% new affiliate partner sign-ups in six months, 1,000+ partners migrated. (impact.com)
Why it worked comes down to three things. The channel fit was strong because Semrush already had a product people recommend. The operational experience improved for partners, which usually matters more than brands admit. And attribution was modernized, which made performance easier to trust. That combination is what made the campaign scalable instead of merely functional. (impact.com)
Hashmeta’s September 2025 case study is worth including because it shows how channel assumptions can blind SaaS teams. The campaign used Xiaohongshu, which many Western marketers still associate more with lifestyle and consumer discovery than B2B demand generation. According to the case study, the campaign generated 1,200 qualified leads, delivered 240% ROI against campaign targets, achieved a 77% webinar attendance rate, and lowered cost per lead by 62%. The strategy included authority-building posts, partnerships with three business KOLs, teaser videos, community engagement, and a webinar structured around localized case studies. (Hashmeta)
This one stands out because it did not treat the platform like a standard ad buy. It used content to build credibility first, then converted that trust through a webinar format that matched the market’s information needs. That sequencing is exactly why it is useful for SaaS marketers. It is a reminder that non-traditional channels can work when the format matches buyer behavior and the content feels native to the platform. (Hashmeta)
Channel mix: Organic authority content, KOL support, teaser video, community engagement, webinar conversion.
Goal: Break into China’s SaaS market and generate qualified leads efficiently.
Reported result: 1,200 qualified leads, 240% ROI vs. target, 77% attendance rate, 62% lower CPL. (Hashmeta)
One note of caution: this is an agency-published case study rather than an independently audited benchmark, so it is best read as a strong directional example rather than a universal planning baseline. Still, the underlying strategic logic is sound. (Hashmeta)
The big shift in SaaS is that teams are moving away from vanity reporting and toward stage-specific accountability. That means awareness is judged less by raw reach and more by efficient attention, consideration is judged by meaningful engagement, conversion is judged by lead quality and sales movement, and retention is judged by expansion and revenue durability, not just clicks or opens. ChartMogul’s retention research says the economics of SaaS have changed enough that existing-customer expansion is now a bigger growth driver than it was a few years ago, especially for companies above $15M ARR. (ChartMogul, SaaS Capital)
SaaS marketers are dealing with a weird mix right now: more tools, more reach options, more automation, and somehow less margin for error. The challenge is not a lack of channels. It is that every channel is getting noisier, pricier, or harder to measure cleanly. The opportunity is that teams willing to tighten their data, creative, and retention systems can still outperform, even in a tougher environment. (WordStream, HubSpot, get.rivaliq.com)
Paid acquisition is still essential, but it is getting harder to brute-force growth through auction-based media. WordStream’s 2025 Google Ads benchmark report says search advertising costs have been rising year over year for the last five years, and that trend is still continuing. In SaaS, that hits especially hard because many of the most valuable keywords already live in crowded, high-intent categories where multiple vendors are bidding for the same buyer. (WordStream)
That creates a painful chain reaction. Higher CPCs and CPMs push up CAC. Higher CAC puts pressure on payback windows. And once payback gets uncomfortable, marketing teams have to prove not just that they can generate pipeline, but that they can generate efficient pipeline. This is exactly why more SaaS teams are shifting part of their budget toward SEO, lifecycle email, product-led acquisition, and partner channels. Not because paid stopped working, but because relying on it too heavily has become expensive and fragile. This is an inference, but it follows directly from rising paid-media costs and flatlined marketing budgets. (WordStream, Content Marketing Institute)
Privacy pressure did not disappear just because Google’s cookie plan got messy. In fact, the operating reality for marketers is now more annoying, not less. Google’s Privacy Sandbox update confirmed that the company stepped back from a full third-party-cookie phaseout timeline in Chrome, but that does not remove the broader trend toward tighter user control and stricter consent expectations. (Privacy Sandbox)
At the same time, regulators are still actively targeting bad consent experiences. The UK ICO announced in January 2025 that it would bring the top 1,000 websites into compliance review around cookie usage, and its published enforcement letters make clear that sites must offer a real reject option at the same point they ask for consent. California is also continuing active enforcement under the CCPA, including recent settlements and a public enforcement page that specifically calls out confusing opt-out flows and dark-pattern-like design choices. (ICO, ICO, California Attorney General, California Attorney General)
For SaaS marketers, the practical implication is simple. First-party data is more valuable. Clean consent flows matter more. And lazy personalization that depends on shaky tracking is becoming less defensible both legally and strategically. The opportunity here is trust: companies that make consent cleaner and data use clearer can turn compliance into a conversion advantage instead of treating it like a legal tax. (ICO, ICO)
AI is now firmly inside the marketing operating model. Content Marketing Institute’s 2025 B2B benchmark report highlights AI as a major investment and priority area for B2B marketers, while HubSpot’s 2025 State of Marketing AI report says adoption and literacy are at all-time highs across the surveyed base. McKinsey’s 2025 global AI survey also found that organizations are moving beyond experimentation and increasingly using AI to drive measurable value. (Content Marketing Institute, HubSpot, McKinsey & Company)
But this is where the opportunity and the risk sit right next to each other. AI can absolutely help SaaS teams produce more content, test more variants, personalize messaging faster, and speed up campaign execution. It can also flood the market with bland sameness. The Wall Street Journal reported this week that some brands are now explicitly advertising “No AI” or AI-light creative choices because consumers are becoming more skeptical of synthetic-looking content. That is a signal worth paying attention to. (The Wall Street Journal, HubSpot)
So the real opportunity is not “use more AI.” It is “use AI where speed helps, and keep humans where judgment matters.” The SaaS teams that win will be the ones that let AI handle production lift while humans stay responsible for positioning, proof, emotional tone, and buyer understanding. (McKinsey & Company, The Wall Street Journal)
Organic social still matters, but the free distribution era keeps shrinking. Rival IQ’s 2025 Social Media Industry Benchmark Report and Socialinsider’s 2025 social reach analysis both point to declining organic reach and harder engagement dynamics across major platforms. Emplifi’s 2025 social benchmark report adds that platform performance is shifting unevenly, with TikTok showing stronger follower growth while other networks demand more creative effort to earn the same visibility. (get.rivaliq.com, Socialinsider, Emplifi)
That does not mean organic is dead. It means organic now behaves more like a creative-performance channel than a passive publishing channel. Brands that post generic updates get ignored. Brands that publish sharper points of view, strong short-form video, creator-style content, and genuinely useful expertise still earn reach, just not automatically. The opportunity is that while reach is harder, standout creative can still travel a long way, especially when it is repurposed across owned, earned, and paid distribution. (get.rivaliq.com, Emplifi)
Most SaaS teams don’t have a “channel problem.” They have a prioritization problem. Too many experiments, not enough conviction. Too many tactics, not enough systems. The goal here is not to list everything you could do. It’s to focus on what actually moves pipeline, retention, and revenue at each stage of maturity.
At this stage, the biggest risk is spreading yourself too thin. You don’t need omnichannel. You need signal.
What to focus on:
What works best:
What to avoid:
The real goal here is not scale. It’s message-market fit and repeatable acquisition.
This is where things get interesting. You’ve found some traction, but efficiency starts to matter.
What to focus on:
What works best:
What to avoid:
This is also where many SaaS companies hit a wall. CAC rises, but conversion doesn’t keep up. The fix is almost always better positioning and better landing pages, not just more traffic.
At scale, growth comes from systems, not just campaigns.
What to focus on:
What works best:
What to avoid:
At this stage, the best companies grow because customers stay longer and spend more, not just because more customers come in.
Not all channels are equal right now. Here’s how they stack up strategically:
Paid Search
Still one of the strongest bottom-funnel channels. High intent, but expensive. Works best when paired with strong landing pages and clear differentiation.
SEO
High ROI over time. Slow to ramp, but compounds. Especially effective for SaaS when focused on:
Email / Lifecycle
Underrated by many teams. One of the highest ROI channels for retention, expansion, and reactivation. Also critical for onboarding and activation.
LinkedIn (Paid + Organic)
Still the most reliable B2B platform for targeting. Expensive, but precise. Works best with:
Short-form Video (TikTok, Reels, LinkedIn video)
Growing fast. Works especially well for:
Partner / Affiliate Channels
Becoming more important as CAC rises. Lower cost over time, but requires setup and relationship management.
If you’re testing creative right now, start here:
The key shift is this: creative is no longer just a wrapper. It’s the message, the hook, and often the conversion driver.
This is where most SaaS companies leave money on the table.
Acquisition gets attention. Retention builds the business.
What to prioritize:
ChartMogul’s research shows expansion is now a major growth driver for SaaS companies above $15M ARR, which reinforces this shift toward retention-led growth.
The next phase of SaaS marketing will look less like “more channels, more content, more spend” and more like tighter systems built around efficiency, trust, and discoverability in AI-assisted buying environments. Growth is still available, but the playbook is changing. Marketing budgets remain under pressure, with Gartner reporting that 2025 budgets stayed flat at 7.7% of company revenue, so most teams are being asked to produce better outcomes without a bigger cushion. (Gartner)
Over the next 12–24 months, paid media will stay important, but budget mix is likely to keep drifting toward channels that compound or improve downstream efficiency. That means more investment in SEO, lifecycle email, owned audience development, and customer expansion programs, not because paid acquisition stopped working, but because flat budgets and rising auction costs make overreliance on paid search and paid social riskier. Gartner’s budget data supports the pressure side of that equation, while broader channel trend data points to marketers doubling down on formats and systems that produce more with less. (Gartner, HubSpot Blog, Content Marketing Institute)
A practical forecast: paid search remains a core bottom-funnel line item, but incremental dollars will face more scrutiny. SEO and content will keep earning budget where they can show pipeline contribution, and lifecycle programs will gain more executive attention because they improve activation, retention, and NRR without requiring constant net-new acquisition spend. That is partly an inference, but it follows directly from flat budgets, ongoing efficiency pressure, and the stronger role of owned channels in current marketing research. (Gartner, HubSpot Blog, Content Marketing Institute)
The stack is heading toward consolidation in some places and specialization in others. AI will be embedded into more CRMs, automation tools, analytics platforms, and content workflows, but buyers will be less interested in “AI” as a label and more interested in whether the tool actually reduces cycle time, improves segmentation, or helps revenue teams act faster. McKinsey’s 2025 work on B2B growth through gen AI points to practical use cases such as sales enablement, personalization, pricing support, and commercial productivity, which fits how SaaS teams are already shifting from experimentation to applied AI. (McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company)
At the same time, the center of gravity in martech is moving toward connected data and operational simplicity. HubSpot’s 2026 State of Marketing framing highlights AI, stronger brand point of view, and “loop” or flywheel-style growth systems, which is another way of saying marketing teams are trying to connect acquisition, conversion, and retention more tightly instead of optimizing them in silos. (HubSpot, HubSpot Blog)
Google will remain crucial, but its role is changing. Traditional search is no longer the only front door to discovery. Forrester’s AI-search commentary says AI-generated traffic is still a minority share today, but growing fast, and argues that zero-click behavior should be treated as an opportunity rather than just a loss of referral traffic. In plain terms, more buyers will consume answers before they ever click through, and when they do arrive, they may show up more informed and closer to evaluation. (Digital Commerce 360)
That means the winners in SaaS marketing will not just “rank.” They will be cited, referenced, quoted, and surfaced across AI-generated summaries, comparison environments, communities, and third-party ecosystems. The Verge’s recent reporting also shows the market responding in messy ways, with some companies trying to influence AI visibility directly, which is a sign that discoverability inside answer engines is already becoming strategically important. (Digital Commerce 360, The Verge)
LinkedIn is likely to keep its position as the most reliable paid B2B platform for professional targeting, but creative quality will matter even more as costs stay high. Short-form video will continue gaining budget share because it is cheap to test, adaptable across channels, and still viewed by marketers as one of the highest-ROI formats. HubSpot’s trend reporting explicitly calls short-form video the top-performing content format used by marketers, and its 2026 report continues to point to visual, AI-aware, and POV-led content as growth areas. (HubSpot Blog, HubSpot, HubSpot Blog)
AI-assisted outbound will likely move from “write more cold emails” to smarter prospect research, account prioritization, message variation, and follow-up orchestration. McKinsey’s B2B AI guidance supports this broader commercial shift: the value is not just in drafting text, but in improving how revenue teams identify opportunities and act on them. The teams that win will use AI to improve targeting and response relevance, not just increase output volume. (McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company)
Marketers will spend more time designing content for citation, summary extraction, and answer-engine visibility. That changes content strategy. Instead of publishing broad, fuzzy blog posts, teams will favor sharper definitions, stronger original data points, quotable comparisons, use-case pages, and proof assets that can survive both human skimming and AI summarization. Forrester’s interpretation of AI search and the broader discussion around zero-click discovery both support this shift. (Digital Commerce 360, The Verge)
As AI lowers the cost of producing generic content, brands with a distinct perspective will stand out more. HubSpot’s 2026 State of Marketing explicitly calls out brand POV alongside AI and loop marketing, which is a strong signal that marketers are recognizing sameness as a performance problem, not just a creative one. (HubSpot)
This one is less flashy, but probably more important than most trend decks admit. As acquisition stays expensive, lifecycle marketing, onboarding, customer education, and expansion campaigns will pull more weight in growth planning. The most durable SaaS growth stories over the next 12–24 months will come from companies that can convert customers once, then expand them repeatedly. That is consistent with the broader budget and efficiency signals already showing up across marketing research. (Gartner, Content Marketing Institute, HubSpot)
Gartner’s view is essentially a discipline story: budgets are flat, so productivity and prioritization matter more. (Gartner, Gartner)
Forrester’s view is a discoverability story: AI search and zero-click behavior are changing how B2B buyers find and evaluate vendors, and marketers should adapt rather than defend the old referral model. (Digital Commerce 360, Forrester)
McKinsey’s view is an execution story: gen AI can unlock profitable B2B growth, but only when it is attached to real workflows, commercial use cases, and cross-functional coordination. (McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company)
HubSpot’s current state-of-marketing view is a format-and-operations story: AI is mainstreaming, short-form video remains highly effective, and marketers need content designed for newer discovery behaviors, including AI search. (HubSpot Blog, HubSpot, HubSpot Blog)
Market size, market growth, and industry context
Content, creative, and messaging trends
Budget and planning context
SaaS metrics and retention context
A few figures in the report were used as planning benchmarks rather than absolute “industry truths.” That includes channel-level CPC, CPM, CTR, landing-page conversion ranges, and content-performance assumptions. Those figures are best interpreted as directional ranges that help frame decisions, not as guaranteed outcomes. The more mature and reliable benchmarks in this report are the broader budget, retention, and survey-based findings from Gartner, SaaS Capital, CMI, and HubSpot. (Gartner, Content Marketing Institute, SaaS Capital, HubSpot)
No primary survey was conducted for this report directly. Instead, the report synthesized external research from:
Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided by PPC.co for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, tax, or professional advice, nor an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security, instrument, or investment strategy. All content, including statistics, commentary, forecasts, and analyses, is generic in nature, may not be accurate, complete, or current, and should not be relied upon without consulting your own financial, legal, and tax advisers. Investing in financial services, fintech ventures, or related instruments involves significant risks—including market, liquidity, regulatory, business, and technology risks—and may result in the loss of principal. PPC.co does not act as your broker, adviser, or fiduciary unless expressly agreed in writing, and assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or losses arising from use of this content. Any forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual outcomes may differ materially. References or links to third-party sites and data are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement or responsibility. Access to this information may be restricted or prohibited in certain jurisdictions, and PPC.co may modify or remove content at any time without notice.
This report compares the month over month performance across the date ranges of December 1st - 31st 2025 and January 1st - 31st 2026.
For the month of January, we found the results to be quite impressive and optimistic, with the highlighted results below:
Overall, the results for Nutrition/Health Product Company in January were positive across the board, with each campaign garnering more conversions, lower cost per conversion, and significantly increased month over month ROAS.
Management of this account is going better than anticipated, and we will continue to find opportunities to garner more conversions and drive ROAS up as much as possible through bid modifications and the addition of new, contextually relevant keywords.
____________________________________________________________________________
January’s performance demonstrates a meaningful shift from learning to efficient acquisition:
This indicates that every £1 spent returned £7.90 in revenue; 6.5x more than December’s 122% ROAS.
MoM Campaign Comparison
January - Nutrition/Health Product Company - 29.33 conversions, £6.76 CPA, 14.04% conversion rate (1389% ROAS)
December - Nutrition/Health Product Company - 8.28 conversions, £42.84 CPA, 3.30% conversion rate (129% ROAS)
MoM increase of 1260% ROAS
January - REMARKETING - 6.27 conversions, £9.41 CPA, 8.33% conversion rate (627% ROAS)
December - REMARKETING - 3 conversions, £55.88 CPA, 0.44% conversion rate (168% ROAS)
MoM increase of 459% ROAS
January - PMAX - 15.10 conversions, £10.56 CPA, 5.74% conversion rate (422% ROAS)
December - PMAX - 5.22 conversions, £63.11 CPA, 1.29% conversion rate (negative ROAS)
MoM increase of 422%+ ROAS
January - Local Doctor Campaign - 4 conversions, £16.55 CPA, 5.71% conversion rate (264% ROAS)
December - Local Doctor Campaign - 3 conversions, £30.58 CPA, 3.26% conversion rate (160% ROAS)
MoM increase of 104%+ ROAS
This campaign benefits from high intent brand-adjacent queries combined with carefully controlled generic terms, making it one of the most reliable drivers of low-cost, and more volume of conversions. Continued prioritization here will compound returns.
Day-of-Week Performance
Certain regions are showing higher purchase intent, such as the UK and Greater London this month. Geographic bid multipliers can be further refined to capitalize on these micro-markets, all the way down to the zip code, and we’re in the process of doing this.
Keyword Performance
Top keywords show clear brand and authority alignment:
These terms demonstrate exceptional intent density and should remain protected with:
Expansion into close-variant and long-tail branded queries
January’s performance reflects extremely strong numbers month over month and we are more than thrilled with the performance, with main highlights being:
With continued optimization and controlled scaling, we expect further efficiency gains and revenue growth in the coming months, and will be modifying based on the increase in CPCs.
